Manifestation of self-regulation in Russian and Chinese youth: a cross-cultural context


Cite item

Abstract

This paper investigates the manifestation of self-regulation in Russian and Chinese youth within a cross-cultural context. The relevance of the study is determined by the high demands placed on the ability of contemporary youth to adapt effectively to the conditions of accelerated social development. The increasing number of international students at Russian universities, particularly from China, highlights the need to consider cross-cultural psychological factors when organizing the educational process. Self-regulation acts as a key mechanism for personal adaptation, determining the success of academic activities, psychological well-being, and the effectiveness of integration into a multicultural educational environment. The aim of the study is to examine the manifestation of self-regulation among Russian and Chinese university students. The research is conducted within a cross-cultural comparative approach. The empirical study involved 655 university students from Russia and China. The research tools included the Short Self-Regulation Questionnaire (SSRQ), the Regulatory Emotional Self-Efficacy (RESE) scale, and the Individualism–Collectivism Scale (ICS). Comparative data analysis was performed using the non-parametric Mann–Whitney U test. The results of the study indicate the existence of differences in the manifestations of self-regulation between Russian and Chinese students. Russian students are characterized by higher levels of goal achievement and behavioral activity, whereas Chinese students demonstrate higher efficacy in regulating negative emotional states (frustration and anger). Differences in cultural value orientations were established; concurrently, elements of similarity were identified in the domain of positive emotional expression, reflecting the influence of globalisation processes and digital culture on the development of contemporary youth groups.

About the authors

Wantong Zheng

Tomsk State University

Email: 307979605@qq.com

postgraduate student of Chair of General and Pedagogical Psychology

Russian Federation, 634050, Russia, Tomsk, Lenin Prospekt, 36

Tatyana A. Vaulina

Tomsk State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: tatvaulina@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3837-3756

PhD (Psychology), Associate Professor, assistant professor of Chair of General and Pedagogical Psychology

Russian Federation, 634050, Russia, Tomsk, Lenin Prospekt, 36

References

  1. Acharya L., Lan Jin, Collins W. College life is stressful today: emerging stressors and depressive symptoms in college students. Journal of American College Health, 2018, vol. 66, no. 7, pp. 655–664. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2018.1451869.
  2. Curran T., Hill A.P. Young people’s perceptions of their parents’ expectations and criticism are increasing over time: implications for perfectionism. Psychological Bulletin, 2022, vol. 148, no. 1–2, pp. 107–128. doi: 10.1037/bul0000347.
  3. Yusof R., Harith N.H.M., Lokman A., Batau M.F.A., Zain Z.M., Rahmat N.H. A study of perception on students’ motivation, burnout and reasons for dropout. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 2023, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 403–432. doi: 10.6007/IJARBSS/V13-I7/17187.
  4. Zimmerman B.J. Attaining self-regulation: a social cognitive perspective. Handbook of self-regulation. New York, Academic press Publ., 2000, pp. 13–39. doi: 10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50031-7.
  5. McClelland M.M., Cameron C.E. Self-regulation in early childhood: improving conceptual clarity and developing ecologically valid measures. Child Development Perspectives, 2012, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 136–142. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-8606.2011.00191.x.
  6. Wang Jin-Kai, Xue Hui-Qin, Wu Xiao-Fei. Mental health and academic achievement among Chinese adolescents during COVID-19 pandemic: the mediating role of self-regulated learning. Social Psychology of Education, 2023, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 1001–1015. doi: 10.1007/s11218-023-09772-4.
  7. Mcinerney D.M., King R.B. Culture and self-regulation in educational contexts. Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance. New York, Routledge Publ., 2017, pp. 485–502. doi: 10.4324/9780203839010.
  8. Messer E.J.E., Roome H.E., Legare C.H. Learning to control through culture: explaining variation in the development of self-regulation. Psychological Review, 2025, vol. 132, no. 4, pp. 956–972. doi: 10.1037/rev0000554.
  9. Lamm B., Keller H., Teiser J. et al. Waiting for the second treat: developing culture-specific modes of self-regulation. Child Development, 2018, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. e261–e277. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12847.
  10. Markus H.R., Kitayama S. Culture and the self: implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 1991, vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 224–253. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224.
  11. Wang Zhen-Dong, Wang Feng-Yan. Ternary Taiji models of the traditional Chinese self: centered on Confucian, Taoist, and Buddhist cultures. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 2025, vol. 65, no. 6, pp. 1311–1333. doi: 10.1177/00221678211016957.
  12. Cai Huajian, Huang Zihang, Lin Li et al. The psychological change of the Chinese people over the past half century: a literature review. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 1599–1688. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2020.01599.
  13. Zhou L.S. The evolutionary logic, basic characteristics, and practical orientation of Russian culture. Study & Exploration, 2025, vol. 2, pp. 139–148.
  14. Chen Yang-Hsueh, Lin Yu-Ju. Validation of the Short Self-Regulation Questionnaire for Taiwanese college students (TSSRQ). Frontiers in Psychology, 2018, vol. 9, article number 259. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00259.
  15. Caprara G.V., Di Giunta L., Eisenberg N., Gerbino M., Pastorelli C., Tramontano C. Assessing regulatory emotional self-efficacy in three countries. Psychological Assessment, 2008, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 227–237. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.20.3.227.
  16. Wen S.F., Tang D.L., Yu G.L. The characteristics of regulatory emotional self-efficacy in Chinese graduate students. Psychological Science (China), 2009, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 666–668.
  17. Triandis H.C., Gelfand M.J. Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1998, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 118–128. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.74.1.118.
  18. Li Z. Effects of undergraduates’ cultural orientation and self-concept on their subjective well-being. Psychological Science, 2006, vol. 2, pp. 423–426.
  19. Gluzman A.A. Philosophical aspects of the problem of personal self-improvement on basis of self-knowledge. The Humanities, 2021, no. 1, pp. 165–176. EDN: ZQDYQW.
  20. Karlova O.A. National idea in Russia: cultural and historical genesis and factors of actualization. Journal of Siberian Federal university. Humanities and Social Sciences, 2019, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 996–1016. doi: 10.17516/1997-1370-0437.
  21. Gao Ruixiang, Huang Shiqi, Yao Yujie et al. Understanding Zhongyong using a Zhongyong approach: re-examining the non-linear relationship between creativity and the Confucian doctrine of the mean. Frontiers in Psychology, 2022, vol. 13, article number 903411. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.903411.
  22. Yang Xueling, Liu Ding, Wang You, Chen Yu, Chen Weichen, Yang Caiyan, Zhang Peining, Ding Siyuan, Zhang Xiaoyuan. Effectiveness of Zhong-Yong thinking based dialectical behavior therapy group skills training versus supportive group therapy for lowering suicidal risks in Chinese young adults: a randomized controlled trial with a 6-month follow-up. Brain and Behavior, 2020, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 16–21. doi: 10.1002/brb3.1621.
  23. Barbalet J. The analysis of Chinese rural society: Fei Xiaotong revisited. Modern China, 2021, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 355–382. doi: 10.1177/0097700419894921.
  24. Chimenson D., Tung R.L., Panibratov A., Fang Tany. The paradox and change of Russian cultural values. International Business Review, 2022, vol. 31, no. 3, article number 101944. doi: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2021.101944.
  25. Mikhaylova O. Understanding of autonomy in Russian youth: an interview study. Journal of Adolescent Research, 2023, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 1434–1455. doi: 10.1177/07435584231214535.
  26. Ward C., Szabó Á. Acculturation, cultural identity and well-being. Nature Reviews Psychology, 2023, vol. 2, pp. 267–282. doi: 10.1038/s44159-023-00171-2.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2025 Zheng W., Vaulina T.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.