Competitiveness as Dominant Discourse in Russian Higher Education

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

Abstract. Problem. This article investigates the problem of competitiveness in Russian higher education. The study presents a piece of qualitative research, in which competitiveness is understood as a socially constructed reality which refers to the practice of innovative optimization of institutions and the increase in their productivity aimed to provide competitive advantage locally and globally. Aim. The main aim of the study is to look at how competitiveness manifests itself as a dominant discourse and political practice in Russian higher education. The underpinning assumption behind the study is that competitiveness is used as an outcome and a governing tool of globalisation and part of the global neoliberal project. Methods. The main method of data collection employed in the study is documents. This made it possible to look at how competitiveness is manifested in legislation at the national level. The main method of data analysis is critical discourse analysis (CDA), which enabled to study the discourse of competitiveness as both a linguistic phenomenon and social reality. Results. The research findings showed that competitiveness has been well integrated into Russian higher education in the past three decades. Linguistically, the analysis showed a variety of representations of competitiveness, organised as dichotomies, such as explicit / implicit competitiveness, national / international competitiveness, etc. Diachronic analysis of education policy texts pointed out a few tendencies such as the reorientation of competitiveness from an individual towards an institutional level, and others. Conclusions. As a socially constructed reality, competitiveness is realised through three interconnected forms: social structures, social events, and social practices. The outcomes of competitiveness as dominant discourse relate to commercialisation, regulation, performativity and selectivity. 

About the authors

Alexander V. Lugovskoy

Pacific National University

Author for correspondence.
Email: 009449@togudv.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1846-4316

master in Education, PhD (Philology),
Associate Professor, assistant professor at
Higher School of Eurolinguistics and Cross-cultural Communication

Russian Federation, 680035, Russia, Khabarovsk, Tikhookeanskaya Street, 136.

References

  1. Foucault M. The archaeology of knowledge and the Discourse on Language. New York, Pantheon Books Publ., 1972. 218 p.
  2. Cammack P. The Politics of Global Competitiveness. Oxford, Oxford University Press Publ., 2022. 213 p. doi: 10.1093/oso/9780192847867.001.0001.
  3. Ong A. Neoliberalism as exception: Mutations in citizenship and sovereignty. Durham, Duke University Press Publ., 2006. 304 p. doi: 10.1515/9780822387879.
  4. Davies W. The limits of neoliberalism: authority, sovereignty and the logic of competition. Los Angeles, Sage Publ., 2014. 220 p.
  5. Hazelkorn E. Rankings and the reshaping of higher education: the battle for world-class excellence. Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan Publ., 2011. 272 p. doi: 10.1057/9780230306394.
  6. Collini S. What are universities for? London, Penguin Books Publ., 2012. 215 p.
  7. Hazelkorn E., Mihut G. Introduction: Putting rankings in context - looking back, looking forward. Research Handbook on University Rankings: Theory, Methodology, Influence and Impact. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing Publ., 2021, pp. 1–17. doi: 10.4337/9781788974981.00008.
  8. Mulatu A. On the concept of ‘competitiveness’ and its usefulness for policy. Structural Change and Economic Dynamic, 2015, vol. 36, pp. 50–62. doi: 10.1016/j.strueco.2015.11.001.
  9. Ginevičius R., Žemaitis E., Šuhajda K., Martin S. Assessing the global competitiveness of European countries. Journal of competitiveness, 2023, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 36–52. doi: 10.7441/joc.2023.04.03.
  10. Bhawsar P., Chattopadhyay U. Competitiveness: Review, reflections and directions. Global Business Review, 2015, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 665–679. doi: 10.1177/0972150915581115.
  11. Hart P.F., Rodgers W. Competition, competitiveness, and competitive advantage in higher education institutions: a systematic literature review. Studies in Higher Education, 2024, vol. 49, no. 11, pp. 2153–2177. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2023.2293926.
  12. Naidoo R. The competition fetish in higher education: varieties, animators and consequences. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 2016, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 1–10. doi: 10.1080/01425692.2015.1116209.
  13. Vasiliev A. Competitiveness and Academic Excellence with Emerging Technologies: Methods for Assessing the Quality of University Education. International Journal of Instruction, 2021, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 1013–1032. doi: 10.29333/iji.2021.14458a.
  14. Fairclough N. Critical discourse analysis: the critical study of language. 2nd ed. London, Routledge Publ., 2010. 608 p.
  15. Ball S. What is policy? Texts, trajectories and toolboxes. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 1993, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 11–17. doi: 10.1080/0159630930130203.
  16. Berestov A.V., Gusev A.I., Kalashnikov V.M., Kaminskiy V.I., Kireev S.V., Sadchikov S.M. National research and federal universities contribution to the project 5-100. Higher Education in Russia, 2020, vol. 29, no. 10, pp. 30–45. doi: 10.31992/0869-3617-2020-29-10-30-45.
  17. Aiginger K. Revisiting an evasive concept: Introduction to the special issue on competitiveness. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 2006, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 63–66. doi: 10.1007/s10842-006-9471-x.
  18. Lingard B. Policy as numbers: Ac/counting for educational research. The Australian Educational Researcher, 2011, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 355–382. doi: 10.1007/s13384-011-0041-9.
  19. Searle J.R. The construction of social reality. New York, The Free Press Publ., 1995. 241 p.
  20. Fairclough I., Fairclough N. Political discourse analysis: a method for advanced students. Abingdon, Routledge Publ., 2012. 278 p.
  21. Reed C., Reed M. Expert Authority in Crisis: Making Authority Real Through Struggle. Organization Theory, 2022, vol. 3, no. 4. doi: 10.1177/26317877221131587.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2026 Lugovskoy A.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.