A set of electronic graphic tasks on descriptive geometry adapted for automated assessment systems

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

The paper raises the problem of quality control of graphic training of technical university students using an automated assessment system. Despite wide access to digital educational resources, the acceptance and checking of drawings and calculation and graphic works in technical universities is still performed manually by teachers. The authors propose replacing the usual forms of graphic tasks on descriptive geometry with electronic metric and positional tasks of a new type. The result of solving such problems is expressed as a number or a short answer and can be compared with the standard using any standard testing system, for example, LMS Moodle. The work presents 20 examples of electronic practical tasks on descriptive geometry, the solution of which can be performed in any graphic editor, and the answer is checked using an automated assessment system. The set of electronic assessment tools developed by the authors contains more than 600 variants of graphic tasks and is designed to check theoretical knowledge and practical skills related to the content of the Descriptive Geometry and Computer Graphics course. The correctness of the tasks is checked automatically by means of the tools of the LMS Moodle electronic learning environment without the participation of the teacher. Pre-designed sets of control parameters, such as area, length, distance, volume, quantity, condition, and type are used for assessment. The system is successfully used for current monitoring of knowledge, skills and abilities of first-year students at the Siberian Transport University. The data from monitoring the learning outcomes indicate the effectiveness of the use of automated diagnostics of the level of development of students’ graphic skills.

About the authors

Anna Viktorovna Petukhova

Siberian Transport University; Novosibirsk State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering (Sibstrin)

Author for correspondence.
Email: petukhovaav@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7775-5220

PhD (Pedagogy), Associate Professor, assistant professor of Chair “Graphics”

Russian Federation, 630049, Novosibirsk, Dusya Kovalchuk Street, 191; 630008, Novosibirsk, Leningradskaya Street, 113

Eduard Valerievich Ermoshkin

Siberian Transport University; Novosibirsk State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering (Sibstrin)

Email: e.ermoshkin@sibstrin.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5520-070X

senior lecturer of Chair “Engineering and Computer Graphics”

Russian Federation, 630049, Russia, Novosibirsk, Dusya Kovalchuk Street, 191; 630008, Russia, Novosibirsk, Leningradskaya Street, 113

References

  1. Siarova H., Sternadel D., Mašidlauskaitė R. Assessment practices for 21st century learning: review of evidence: analytical report. Luxembourg, Publications Office of the European Union Publ., 2017. 90 p.
  2. Archer E. The Assessment Purpose Triangle: Balancing the Purposes of Educational Assessment. Frontiers Education, 2017, vol. 2, article number 41. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2017.00041.
  3. Avanesov V.S. Pedagogical Measurements Fundamentals Theory. Pedagogicheskie izmereniya, 2004, no. 1, pp. 15–21.
  4. Chistova Ya.S., Kozlenkova E.N., Nazarova L.I. Assessment kit as a diagnosing tool of professional education quality. Agroinzheneriya, 2023, no. 25, pp. 91–96. doi: 10.26897/2687-1149-2023-4-91-96.
  5. Nurakhmetov D. Reinforcement Learning Applied to Adaptive Classification Testing. Theoretical and Practical Advances in Computer-based Educational Measurement. Methodology of Educational Measurement and Assessment. Cham, Springer Publ., 2019, pp. 325–366. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-18480-3_17.
  6. Vyalkova O.S., Eltsova V.Yu. Testing as a quality control technique of engineering graphics training of university students. Obshchestvo: sotsiologiya, psikhologiya, pedagogika, 2019, no. 4, pp. 118–125. doi: 10.24158/spp.2019.4.21.
  7. Harlen W. On the relationship between assessment for formative and summative purposes. Assessment and Learning. 2nd ed. USA, SAGE Publications Ltd Publ., 2012, pp. 87–102. doi: 10.4135/9781446250808.n6.
  8. Goh K.N., Mohd Shukri S.R., Manao R. Automatic assessment for engineering drawing. Advances in visual informatics. Cham, Springer International Publ., 2013, vol. 8237, pp. 497–507. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-02958-0_45.
  9. Younes R., Bairaktarova D. ViTA: A flexible CAD-tool-independent automatic grading platform for two-dimensional CAD drawings. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, 2022, vol. 50, pp. 135–157. doi: 10.1177/0306419020947688.
  10. Bryan J.A. Automatic grading software for 2D CAD files. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 2020, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 51–61. doi: 10.1002/cae.22174.
  11. Yukhta N.M. Computerized systems of graphic work review and assessment in the academic digital information and education environment. Nauchnye i tekhnicheskie biblioteki, 2022, no. 5, pp. 99–111. doi: 10.33186/1027-3689-2022-5-99-111.
  12. Lisa Wang Jianwu, Lim See Yew, Lin Kok On, Tan Chee Keong, Ricky Tan Yuan Sheng, Sairin Bin Sani, Tan Hwee Juan Agness. Artificial intelligence-enabled evaluating for computer-aided drawings (AMCAD). International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, 2024, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 3–31. doi: 10.1177/03064190231175231.
  13. Boykov A.A. Computer verification of descriptive geometry task solutions for engineering and graphic education. Geometriya i grafika, 2020, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 66–81. doi: 10.12737/2308-4898-2020-66-81.
  14. Shmulenkova E.E. Experiment and analysis of introduction of graphic construction checking system in educational process. Omskiy nauchnyy vestnik, 2008, no. 4, pp. 172–177. EDN: TLTTDX.
  15. Villa V., Motyl B., Paderno D., Baronio G. TDEG based framework and tools for innovation in teaching technical drawing: The example of LaMoo project. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 2018, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 1293–1305. doi: 10.1002/cae.22022.
  16. Speranza D., Baronio G., Motyl B., Filippi S., Villa V. Best practices in teaching technical drawing: experiences of collaboration in three Italian Universities. Advances on Mechanics, Design Engineering and Manufacturing. USA, Springer International Publ., 2017, pp. 903–913. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-45781-9_90.
  17. Sergeeva I.A., Bolbat O.B. Computer testing and drawing skills. Obrazovanie i problemy razvitiya obshchestva, 2024, no. 1, pp. 62–71. EDN: KEOQMA.
  18. Grosheva T.V., Shelyakina G.G. To the question of students’ graphic training quality monitoring effectiveness. Geometriya i grafika, 2017, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 75–82. doi: 10.12737/article_5a18042dd1a667.42394929.
  19. Petukhova A.V., Bolbat O.B., Andryushina T.V. Experience in developing a digital fund of assessment tools for a university course of computer graphics. Vestnik Sibirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta putey soobshcheniya: Gumanitarnye issledovaniya, 2023, no. 4, pp. 88–94. EDN: JIFGVJ.
  20. Petukhova A.V. Automatic generation of description geometry tasks using parametric templates. Vestnik Yuzhno-Uralskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Stroitelstvo i arkhitektura, 2024, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 55–65. EDN: MODEJV.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2025 Petukhova A.V., Ermoshkin E.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies