Regional model for developing functional literacy in a digital educational environment: concept, implementation, and effectiveness assessment
- Authors: Akopyan V.A.1
-
Affiliations:
- Ministry of Education of the Samara Region
- Issue: No 3 (2025)
- Pages: 11-23
- Section: Pedagogical Sciences
- URL: https://vektornaukipedagogika.ru/jour/article/view/1211
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18323/3034-2996-2025-3-62-1
- ID: 1211
Cite item
Abstract
The civilizational transition generates an objective societal need for the development of functional literacy as a key factor for national security and individual success. In response to this need, a dynamic and adaptive model for developing functional literacy is proposed. Its primary advantage is the ability to integrate the relevant regional context and flexibly respond to the challenges of instability and rapid socio-cultural changes. The role of the regional digital educational environment (DEE) in fostering functional literacy among students was examined, using the Samara Region as an example. Monitoring results of students’ functional literacy conducted in 2019 revealed insufficient development of global competencies and creative thinking. To address this issue, the DEE of the region was leveraged to enhance educational quality: students were engaged in project-based activities, their analytical skills were developed, and they were offered contextual tasks simulating real-life situations. Resources of the regional system of supplementary education were actively utilized. Over a four-year period, annual monitoring demonstrated that by 2022, the proportion of students achieving high results increased to 60 % compared to 19.8 % in 2019, representing more than a threefold improvement. These findings indicate the positive potential of using the DEE to create a multifunctional regional educational environment that develops both personal and academic competencies. A key prospect of the study is the transition from episodic monitoring to a continuous formative assessment system based on the DEE, enabling near real-time collection and analysis of educational outcomes at all levels – from individual students to municipalities – for prompt adjustment of the educational process.
About the authors
Viktor A. Akopyan
Ministry of Education of the Samara Region
Author for correspondence.
Email: ava1977@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0004-4839-9302
PhD (Pedagogy), Associate Professor, Minister of Education of the Samara Region
Russian Federation, 443099, Samara, A. Tolstoy Street, 38/16References
- Leontev A.A., ed. Obrazovatelnaya sistema “Shkola 2100”. Pedagogika zdravogo smysla [The School 2100 educational system. Common sense pedagogy]. Moscow, Rossiyskaya akademiya obrazovaniya Publ., 2003. 368 p.
- Zakharova V.A. Functional literacy in retrospect and perspective: problem-historical analysis of foreign sources. Education Management Review, 2023, no. 4, pp. 208–217. doi: 10.25726/v3039-0555-6987-i.
- Valentine T. Adult functional literacy as a goal of instruction. Adult education quarterly, 1986, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 108–113. doi: 10.1177/0001848186036002005.
- Ozenc E.G., Dogan M.C. The development of the functional literacy experience scale based upon ecological theory (FLESBUET) and validity-reliability study. Educational Science: Theory and practice, 2014, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 2249–2258. URL: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1050550.pdf.
- Kindl J., Lenhard W. A meta-analysis on the effectiveness of functional literacy interventions for adults. Educational Research Review, 2023, vol. 41, article number 100569. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100569.
- Bosser U. Transformation of school science practices to promote functional scientific literacy. Research in Science Education, 2023, vol. 54, pp. 265–281. doi: 10.1007/s11165-023-10138-1.
- Kovaleva G.S., Rutkovskaya E.L., Kolachev N.I., Baranova V.Yu. The dynamics in results of assessing the financial literacy of the Russian students in the international PISA study. Otechestvennaya i zarubezhnaya pedagogika, 2021, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 41–59. EDN: HMEPEA.
- Noskova T.N., Pavlova T.B. Pedagogical technology for solving competence problems in a digital environment. Informatics and education, 2022, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 37–44. doi: 10.32517/0234-0453-2022-37-6-37-44.
- Stolbova I.D., Kochurova L.V., Nosov K.G. About digital transformation of subject learning. Informatics and education, 2020, no. 9, pp. 53–63. doi: 10.32517/0234-0453-2020-35-9-53-63.
- Chakhnashvili M.L., Ivanov D.V. Impact of digitalization on the health of children and adolescents. Journal of New Medical Technologies, 2022, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 56–66. doi: 10.24412/2075-4094-2022-3-2-2.
- Scheerder A., Deursen A., Van Dijk J. Determinants of Internet skills, uses and outcomes. A systematic review of the second- and third-level digital divide. Telematics and Informatics, 2017, vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 1607–1624. doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2017.07.007.
- Noskova T.N. Digital educational environment: the methodological aspect of launching innovations. Informatics and education, 2023, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 45–51. doi: 10.32517/0234-0453-2023-38-6-45-51.
- Grigoreva I.V., Bolkunov G.A. The digital learning environment (DLE): challenges and opportunities. Bulletin of the University of the Russian Academy of Education, 2023, no. 2, pp. 64–71. doi: 10.24412/2072-5833-2023-2-64-71.
- Chernykh S.I., Borisenko I.G. Digital educational environment as the main trend in the education transformation. Philosophy of Education, 2021, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 5–17. doi: 10.15372/PHE20210301.
- Gelman V.Ya. Decline in educational achievement on the PISA test and the development of information and communication technology. International Research Journal, 2024, no. 3, pp. 26–31. doi: 10.23670/IRJ.2024.141.42.
- Korte M. The impact of the digital revolution on human brain and behavior: where do we stand? Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 2022, vol. 22, pp. 101–111. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2020.22.2/mkorte.
- Small G.W., Lee Jooyeon, Kaufman A., Jalil J., Siddarth P., Gaddipati H., Moody T.D., Bookheimer S.Y. Brain health consequences of digital technology use. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 2020, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 179–187. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2020.22.2/gsmall.
- Firth J., Torous J., Stubbs B. et al. The “online brain”: how the Internet may be changing our cognition. World Psychiatry, 2019, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 119–129. doi: 10.1002/wps.20617.
- Krasnov P.O., Torgashina N.G., Suprun E.V., Chaban T.Yu. Science literacy: from regional monitoring to school practice. Otechestvennaya i zarubezhnaya pedagogika, 2020, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 275–288. EDN: YBNXIY.
- Akopyan V.A. Actualization of formation functional literacy of secondary school students. Russian Journal of Education and Psychology, 2023, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 61–74. doi: 10.12731/2658-4034-2023-14-5-61-74.
Supplementary files
