INTERDISCIPLINARY RELATIONSHIPS IN THE FORMATION OF MATHEMATICAL THINKING THROUGH THE STUDY OF GEOMETRY (THE EXAMPLE OF “VECTORS” AND “METHOD OF COORDINATES” SECTIONS)
- Authors: Eremeeva N.I.1, Kukhareva E.A.1, Romanovskaya T.I.1
-
Affiliations:
- Dimitrovgrad Engineering and Technological Institute of the National Research Nuclear University MEPhI, Dimitrovgrad
- Issue: No 2 (2017)
- Pages: 41-46
- Section: Pedagogical Sciences
- URL: https://vektornaukipedagogika.ru/jour/article/view/223
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18323/2221-5662-2017-2-41-46
- ID: 223
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
In recent years, it is said frequently enough about the necessity of applying mathematical knowledge in all fields of science and economy. However, mathematics is difficult for many students to learn. Increasingly frequently, various experts say about the low level of mathematical training of school and university students. Such problems as the lack of background knowledge, the separation of theory and practice, and the lack of continuity in the school and higher mathematics can be observed in the modern school mathematical education. The paper suggests one of the most effective ways of eliminating these issues – the introduction of interdisciplinary relationships to the educational process. The advantages of interdisciplinary relationships application are displayed through the example of studying two sections of school mathematics: vectors and method of coordinates. It is reasonable to show the alternative ways of solving the same task, including the application of methods of the related disciplines, to the students of classes with the advanced study of mathematics the graduates of which are the intending students of technical universities. The paper gives the example of solving the geometrical task by two methods (traditional and using vectors and the system of coordinates) and suggests the comparative analysis of the complexity of the solutions obtained.
The analysis of the problems determined in the mathematical education allows speaking about a number of advantages of the interdisciplinary relationships in education. Among them are the creation of the general picture of subject matter that causes its in-depth understanding, the application of the alternative methods of solving tasks that allow escaping stereotypeness, and the elimination of gap between the school and university programs in mathematics.
About the authors
Nina Igorevna Eremeeva
Dimitrovgrad Engineering and Technological Institute of the National Research Nuclear University MEPhI, Dimitrovgrad
Email: eremeev.juri@yandex.ru
PhD (Physics and Mathematics), assistant professor of Chair “Higher mathematics”
Russian FederationEkaterina Aleksandrovna Kukhareva
Dimitrovgrad Engineering and Technological Institute of the National Research Nuclear University MEPhI, Dimitrovgrad
Author for correspondence.
Email: kuxareva@mail.ru
PhD (Pedagogics), assistant professor of Chair “Higher mathematics”
Russian FederationTatyana Ivanovna Romanovskaya
Dimitrovgrad Engineering and Technological Institute of the National Research Nuclear University MEPhI, Dimitrovgrad
Email: TIRomanovskaya@mephi.ru
PhD (Pedagogics), Head of Chair “Higher mathematics”
Russian FederationReferences
- Purysheva N.S., Gurina R.V. Management of educational innovations and their emergency consequences. Uchenye zapiski Zabaykalskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Professionalnoe obrazovanie, teoriya i metodika obucheniya, 2015, no. 6, pp. 66–71.
- Komartsov O.M., Korotkov V.V., Sakharov V.V. Problems of teaching in technical universities. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya, 2014, no. 6, pp. 830–837.
- Ostrozhkov P.A., Kuznetsov M.A., Lazarev S.I. The analysis of experience of teaching geometric-graphic disciplines at a technical university (revealing of the reasons of problems and search of contradictions). Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Seriya: Yestestvennye i tekhnicheskie nauki, 2008, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 416–423.
- Dobrina E.A. Preemstvennost v obuchenii analiticheskoy geometrii mezhdu mezhdu shkoloy i vuzom. Diss. kand. ped. nauk [Continuity in teaching analytical geometry at school and university]. Elets, 2007. 217 p.
- Atanasyan L.S., Butuzov V.F., Kadomtsev S.B. Geometriya. 7–9 klassy [Geometry. 7–9 grades]. Moscow, Prosveshchenie Publ., 2014. 383 p.
- Pogorelov A.V. Geometriya [Geometry]. Moscow, Prosveshchenie Publ., 1993. 383 p.
- Aleksandrov A.D., Verner A.L., Ryzhik V.I. Matematika: algebra i nachala matematicheskogo analiza, geometriya. Geometriya. 10–11 klassy [Mathematics: algebra and pre-calculus, geometry. Geometry. 10–11 grades]. Moscow, Prosveshchenie Publ., 2014. 255 p.
- Golub L.V. Organizatsionno-pedagogicheskie osnovy nepreryvnogo professionalnogo obrazovaniya v modeli “uchilishche-kolledzh-vuz” (na primere pedagogicheskikh uchebnykh zavedeniy Rostovskoy oblasti). Avtoref. diss. kand. ped. nauk [Organizational and pedagogical basics of continuous professional training in the model “specialized school-college-university” (the example of pedagogical institutions of Rostov region)]. Rostov-on-Don, 1999. 40 p.
- Slastenin V.A., Isaev I.F., Shiyanov E.N. Pedagogika [Pedagogy]. 3rd ed. stereotip. Moscow, Akademiya Publ., 2004. 576 p.
- Zagvyazinskiy V.I. Teoriya obucheniya. Sovremennaya interpretatsiya [Training theory: a modern interpretation]. Moscow, Akademiya Publ., 2001. 187 p.
- Nikitenko E.V. The concept and principles of integration of education. Nauka i obrazovanie: sbornik nauchnykh statey. Omsk, OmGPU Publ., 2004, vyp. 22, pp. 496–500.
- Komenskiy Ya.A. Izbrannye pedagogicheskie sochineniya [Selected pedagogical works]. Moscow, Uchpedgiz Publ., 1955. 655 p.
- Pestalotstsi I.G. Izbrannye pedagogicheskie proizvedeniya [Selected pedagogic works]. Moscow, APN RSFSR Publ., 1963. Vol. 2, 428 p.
- Kedrov B.M. Besedy o dialektike: shestidnevnye filosofskie dialogi vo vremya puteshestviya [Conversations about dialectics: six-day philosophical dialogues while traveling]. 2nd ed. Moscow, Molodaya gvardiya Publ., 1989. 237 p.
- Berulava M.N. Integratsiya soderzhaniya obrazovaniya [Education content integration]. Moscow, Pedagogika Publ., 1993. 172 p.
- Kostyuk N.T., Lutay V.S., Belogub V.D. Integratsiya sovremennogo nauchnogo znaniya (metodologicheskiy analiz) [Integration of modern scientific knowledge (methodological analysis)]. Kiev, Vishcha shkola Publ., 1984. 184 p.
- Brazhe T.G. Subjects’ integration in modern school. Literatura v shkole, 1996, no. 5, pp. 150–154.
- Pulbere A., Gukalenko O., Ustimenko S. Integrated technology. Vysshee obrazovanie Rossii, 2004, no. 1, pp. 123–124.
- Maksimova V.N. Mezhpredmetnye svyazi v uchebno-vospitatelnom protsesse sovremennoy shkoly [Interdisciplinary relationships within the teaching and educational process]. Moscow, Prosveshchenie Publ., 1987. 160 p.
- Maksimova V.N. Mezhpredmetnye svyazi v protsesse obucheniya [Intersubjective connections in the teaching process]. Moscow, Prosveshchenie Publ., 1988. 192 p.
- Baydak V.A. Teoriya i metodika obucheniya matematike: nauka, uchebnaya distsiplina [Theory and methods of mathematics studying: science, study discipline]. Omsk, OmGPU Publ., 2008. 264 p.
- Mathematics, profile level. Obrazovatelnyy portal dlya podgotovki k ekzamenam. URL: ege.sdamgia.ru.