SPECIAL ASPECTS OF DEMONSTRATION OF COMMUNICATIVE TOLERANCE OF THE STUDENTS OF VARIOUS SPECIALTIES


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The paper covers the study of psychological aspects of the development of communicative tolerance of the students of the college of education. The author introduces the major approaches to the definition of tolerance and the meaning of this concept in Russian psychological science. The paper presents the generalized definition of communicative tolerance as the framework characteristic reflecting the level of personal tolerance for unpleasant and unacceptable mental states, qualities and actions of the interaction partners.

The author carried out the comparative analysis of tolerant and intolerant attitudes of the students – future representatives of socionomy and signomy types of professions. The organizational methods (comparative method in particular), psychognostic methods and methods of quantity-quality (statistical) data processing were used as the methods of study. In the result of psychological diagnostics, the author revealed that the students of the college of education participated in the study had the middle level of communicative tolerance, which can be expressed in the form of situational, professional and typological tolerant and intolerant attitudes. In the paper, it is statistically proved that the level of general communicative tolerance of the students – future representatives of signomy type of professions is averagely higher than that of the student – future representatives of socionomy type of professions. However, part of the students representing the signomy type of professions at the initial stages of learning demonstrates such intolerant communicative attitudes as self-righteousness and intolerance while evaluating other people that can hinder their professional interaction. Special attention should be focused on the “Social work” specialty students who demonstrated such intolerant communicative attitudes as the inability or unwillingness to understand or accept individual peculiarities of other people. The results of the study proved the importance of the diagnostics and development of communicative tolerance and certain intolerant attitudes of the students of the college of education for the improvement of their vocational training.

About the authors

Yuliya Mikhailovna Vlasenko

P.M. Masherov Vitebsk State University, Vitebsk

Author for correspondence.
Email: yulenka-888@yandex.ru

postgraduate student of Chair of psychology

Russian Federation

References

  1. Asmolov A.G., Soldatova G.U., Shaygerova L.A. Concerning the meanings of concept of “tolerance”. Vek tolerantnosti, 2001, no. 1, pp. 8–19.
  2. Grinshpun I.B. Concept and content-related characteristics of tolerance. Tolerantnoe soznanie i formirovanie tolerantnykh otnosheniy (teoriya i praktika): sbornik nauchno-metodicheskikh statey. Moscow, MPSI Publ., 2003, pp. 31–40.
  3. Rean A.A. Psikhologiya izucheniya lichnosti [Study of personality psychology]. Sankt Petersburg, V.A. Mikhaylov Publ., 1999. 288 p.
  4. Labunskaya V.A. Social and psychological causes of intolerant communication. Vek tolerantnosti, 2001, no. 3-4, pp. 100–112.
  5. Skripkina T.P. Confidence and tolerance: are there any borders? Vek tolerantnosti, 2001, no. 3-4, pp. 42–52.
  6. Soldatova G.U. Tolerance and intolerance – two faces of interethnic interaction. Vek tolerantnosti, 2001, no. 1, pp. 131–137.
  7. Asmolov A.G., ed. Psikhosemanticheskiy analiz etnicheskikh stereotipov: liki tolerantnosti i neterpimosti [Psychosemantic analysis of ethnic stereotypes: the faces of tolerance and intolerance]. Moscow, Smysl Publ., 2000. 73 p.
  8. Tretyak V.G. Psychology of tolerance and activity category in the theory of integral individuality. Obshchestvo i pravo, 2003, no. 1, pp. 77–81.
  9. Soldatova G.U., Shaygerova L.A., Sharova O.D. Zhit v mire s soboy i drugimi: trening tolerantnosti dlya podrostkov [To live in peace with yourself and other: tolerance training for teenagers]. Moscow, Genezis Publ., 2001. 112 p.
  10. Rean A.A., Kolominskiy Ya.L. Sotsialnaya pedagogicheskaya psikhologiya [Social pedagogical psychology]. Sankt Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2000. 416 p.
  11. Grechko P.K. About the boundaries of tolerance. Svobodnaya mysl XXI veka, 2005, no. 10, pp. 173–182.
  12. Lektorskiy V.A. Concerning tolerance, pluralism and criticism. Voprosy filosofii, 1997, no. 11, pp. 46–54.
  13. Baeva L.V. Tolerantnost: ideya, obrazy, personalii [Tolerance: ideas, images, people]. Astrakhan’, Astrakhanskiy universitet Publ., 2009. 216 p.
  14. Asmolov A.G. Na puti k tolerantnomu soznaniyu [On the way to tolerant consciousness]. Moscow, Smysl Publ., 2000. 255 p.
  15. Petrovskiy A.V., Yaroshevskiy M.G., ed. Psikhologicheskiy slovar [Psychological dictionary]. Moscow, Politizdat Publ., 1990. 494 p.
  16. Gusaeva K.G., Magomedova E.K. Tolerance as the basis of stability of international and inter-confessional relations. Politika i obshchestvo, 2007, no. 3, pp. 27–32.
  17. Nurligayanova O.B. Psikhologicheskoe soderzhanie pedagogicheskoy tolerantnosti kak professionalno vazhnogo kachestva uchitelya. Diss. kand. psikhol. nauk [Psychological content of pedagogical tolerance as the professionally important quality of a teacher]. Yaroslavl’, 2006. 188 p.
  18. Bondyreva S.K., Kolesov D.V. Tolerantnost (vvedenie v problemu) [Tolerance (introduction to the problem)]. Voronezh, MPSI Publ., 2003. 240 p.
  19. Klimov E.A. Psikhologiya professionalnogo samoopredeleniya [Psychology of professional self-determination]. Moscow, Akademiya Publ., 2004. 304 p.
  20. Boyko V.V. Energiya emotsiy v obshchenii: vzglyad na sebya i na drugikh [Energy of emotions in communication: a look at yourself and others]. Moscow, Filin’ Publ., 1996. 472 p.
  21. Shevandrin N.I. Psikhodiagnostika: korrektsiya i razvitie lichnosti [Psychodiagnostics, correction and personality. development]. Moscow, VLADOS Publ., 2001. 512 p.
  22. Nasledov A.D. Matematicheskie metody psikhologicheskogo issledovaniya. Analiz i interpretatsiya dannykh [Mathematical methods of psychological research. Analysis and interpretation of data]. Sankt Petersburg, Rech’ Publ., 2004. 392 p.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c)



This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies