STUDY OF SEXUAL INSTALLATIONS IN THE CONTEXT OF STUDY OF THE FAMILY IMAGE IN MODERN YOUNG MEN AND WOMEN


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Currently, the intimate sphere of a modern person is still understudied from the psychological point of view. The paper considers special aspects of the sexual sphere of Russian young people. Taking into account the existing data in the related areas, the authors give the results of the comparative analysis of the attitudes to sex and the family pattern and describe special characteristics of the mechanism of the interrelation between the family experience and psychosexual activity. Two groups of men and women between the ages of 20 to 25 years participated in the research. This age is critical for the development of the experience to build up the intimate relationship with the opposite sex that is related to the going through the previous experience in the parents’ family. The results of the study highlight the multifactorial character of internal convictions of men in the sexual sphere which are characterized by the greater commitment to the physics of relations. The women of this age, in the attitudes to sex, are focused on the formation of the psychological contact. In the result of statistical correlation analysis, the authors identified special aspects of gender differences in the attitudes to sex depending on the level of family adaptation, cohesion, emotional bond, family boundaries, and discipline within the parents’ family. The significance of the family system in the formation and development of sexual socialization of a person is identified. The attention is drawn to the difference in the visions of family relations of men and women of this sample what can impede the formation of mutual understanding. The authors concluded about the necessity to help a modern woman in solving the task of increasing the lability of adopted attitudes to sex, prove the importance of rendering of assistance to a modern man in the change of attitudes while implementing sexual activity under the domination of hegemonic masculinity that can be difficult to comply.  

About the authors

Pavla Aleksandrovna Korneychuk

Pacific State Medical University, Vladivostok

Author for correspondence.
Email: pavla.korneychuk@mail.ru

student

Russian Federation

Natalya Valerievna Khaimanova

Pacific State Medical University, Vladivostok

Email: mail@vgmu.ru

PhD (Medicine), senior lecturer of Chair of Clinical Psychology

Russian Federation

References

  1. Kon I.S. Three in One: Sexual, Gender and Family Revolution. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsialnoy antropologii, 2011, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 51–65.
  2. Matveeva E.V., Kozhevina V.A. Sexual behavior of modern Russian youth as a subject of psychological analysis. Vestnik gumanitarnogo obrazovaniya, 2017, no. 1, pp. 57–64.
  3. Rogacheva T.V., Malikova N.N., Zakharov M.A. Sexual culture of modern Russian youth. Meditsinskaya psikhologiya v Rossii: elektronnyy nauchnyy zhurnal, 2013, no. 1. URL: mprj.ru/archiv_global/2013_1_18/nomer/nomer12.php.
  4. Ioffe E.V. The role of factors of sexual socialization in the formation of sexual scenarios of teenagers. Klinicheskaya i meditsinskaya psikhologiya: issledovaniya, obuchenie, praktika: elektronnyy nauchnyy zhurnal, 2016, no. 1. URL: medpsy.ru/climp.
  5. Kholodnyy V.A. Medical sexological model of psychosexual development. Vestnik nevrologii, psikhiatrii i neyrokhirurgii, 2014, no. 10, pp. 3–10.
  6. Mishina T.M. Family psychotherapy and the dynamics of “family pattern”. Psikhologiya i psikhoprofilaktika: sbornik nauchnykh trudov. Leningrad, LGU Publ., 1983, pp. 21–26.
  7. Kliver F. Merger and differentiation in marriage. Teoriya semeynykh sistem Myurreya Bouena: Osnovnye ponyatiya, metody i klinicheskaya praktika. Moscow, Kogito-Tsentr Publ., 2015, pp. 305–339.
  8. Erikson E. Identichnost. Identichnost: yunost i krizis [Identity: Youth and crisis]. 2nd izd. Moscow, Flinta Publ., 2006. 352 p.
  9. Kashchenko E.A., ed. Psikhologiya seksualnosti [Psychology of sexuality]. Voronezh, Nauchnaya kniga Publ., 2016. 535 p.
  10. Olifirovich N.I., Zinkevich-Kuzemkina T.A., Velenta T.F. Psikhologiya semeynykh krizisov [Psychology of family crises]. Sankt Petersburg, Rech’ Publ., 2006. 360 p.
  11. Serkin V.P. Metody psikhologii subektivnoy semantiki i psikhosemantiki [Methods of psychology of subjective semantics and psychosemantics]. Moscow, Pchela Publ., 2008. 378 p.
  12. Berns R.S., Kaufman S.Kh. Kineticheskiy risunok semi: vvedenie v ponimanie detey cherez kineticheskie risunki [Kinetic Family Drawings. An Introduction to Understanding Children Through Kinetic Drawings]. Moscow, Smysl Publ., 2000. 160 p.
  13. Barylnik Yu.B., Kolesnichenko E.V., Guseva M.A., Titova A.A., Kuzina M.V. Modern features of sexual behavior of students. Saratovskiy nauchno-meditsinskiy zhurnal, 2016, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 582–585.
  14. Dokuchaeva S.O. The impact of parental family on matrimonial family formation in future generation. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie, 2005, no. 3, pp. 41–55.
  15. Konina M.A., Kholmogorova A.B. The phenomenon of unrestricted sexual behavior in the historical context of different types of sexual culture. Konsultativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya, 2014, no. 3, pp. 119–140.
  16. Bern E. Igry, v kotorye igrayut lyudi. Ponyat motivy sobstvennykh i chuzhikh postupkov [Games People Play. To understand the reasons for own and another person’s acts]. Moscow, Eksmo Publ., 2016. 604 p.
  17. Kashchenko E.A. About the paradoxicality of an object of psychology of sexuality. Ocherki sovremennoy psikhologii seksualnosti: sbornik nauchnykh statey. Ekaterinburg, Izdatelskie resheniya Ridero Publ., 2017, pp. 121–128.
  18. Beyker K., Varga A.Ya., eds. Teoriya semeynykh sistem Myurreya Bouena: Osnovnye ponyatiya, metody, i klinicheskaya praktika [Family systems theory of Murray Bowen: Basic concepts, methods and clinical practice]. 2nd izd. ster. Moscow, Kogito-Tsentr Publ., 2015. 496 p.
  19. Aleksandrova O.V., Barkova S.M. Perception of one’s childhood sexual experience as a part of social-psychological adaptation in the early adulthood. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Psikhologiya i pedagogika, 2015, no. 4, pp. 142–152.
  20. Santelli J.S., Kantor L.M., Grilo S.A., Speizer I.S., Lindberg L.D., Heitel J., Schalet A.T., Lyon M.E., Mason-Jones A.J., McGovern T., Heck C.J., Rogers J., Ott M.A. Abstinence-Only-Until-Marriage: An Updated Review of U.S. Policies and Programs and Their Impact. Journal of Adolescent Health, 2017, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 273–280.
  21. Ioffe E.V. Norms of Masculinity and Sexuality of Men. Vestnik Severo-Vostochnogo federalnogo universiteta im. M.K. Ammosova. Seriya: Pedagogika. Psikhologiya. Filosofiya, 2017, no. 3, pp. 51–62.
  22. Kudrina A., Melkov S. The Evolution of Views on Gender and Gender Identityin Psychoanalysis from its Origin up to the 1990s. Razvitie lichnosti, 2015, no. 2, pp. 96–119.
  23. Chalova A.V. Men’s sexuality in the context of interpersonal relationships. Vestnik Tverskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pedagogika i psikhologiya, 2015, no. 3, pp. 318–325.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c)



This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies