ENGLISH PLACEMENT TEST FOR NON-LINGUISTIC STUDENTS AS A FACTOR TO INCREASE TEACHING EFFICIENCY
- Authors: Tatarnitseva S.N.1, Konoplyuk N.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Togliatti State University, Togliatti
- Issue: No 2 (2017)
- Pages: 53-58
- Section: Pedagogical Sciences
- URL: https://vektornaukipedagogika.ru/jour/article/view/225
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18323/2221-5662-2017-2-53-58
- ID: 225
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Vocational university training requires graduates’ mastering not only professional competencies but also other competencies that provide adequate communication and IT literacy. However, the ability of Russian university graduates to use a foreign language leaves much to be desired. The quality of language training at a university can be increased by means of grouping the first-year students according to their level of a foreign language, which can create relatively equivalent conditions for acquiring the language and most effectively develop communication skills in accordance with the language abilities of the students. The aim of this paper is to analyze and describe the existing systems of placement testing including the authors’ test based on international language testing system TOEIC (Test of English for International Communication). The paper studies such concepts as “test” and “pedagogical testing” and explains the general structure of a test. The authors consider the concept “placement test” which implies stratification into levels. The levels described are based on the European scale CEFR. Besides, the authors analyze the existing systems of placement testing, i.e. Oxford Placement test, EF test, etc., and specify advantages and disadvantages of their use in Russian universities. Finally, the authors give a detailed description of the Placement Test developed for Togliatti State University students and interpret the experience of using the testing in 2016. The results of the research and the test approbation prove the reliability and veracity of the suggested method of language skills level assessment.
About the authors
Svetlana Nikolaevna Tatarnitseva
Togliatti State University, Togliatti
Author for correspondence.
Email: alyeparusa08@mail.ru
PhD (Pedagogy), assistant professor of Chair “Theory and Methodology of Teaching Foreign Languages and Cultures”
Russian FederationNatalya Vladimirovna Konoplyuk
Togliatti State University, Togliatti
Email: n.konoplyuk@mail.ru
PhD (Philology), assistant professor of Chair “Theory and Methodology of Teaching Foreign Languages and Cultures”
Russian FederationReferences
- Bakharev N.P., Dragunova E.A. Formation of professional competence of students university under continuous multilevel system of education and a specific trainin for industry. Vektor nauki Tolyattinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pedagogika, psikhologiya, 2014, no. 4, pp. 18–22.
- Kazantsev A.Yu., Kazantseva G.S. Effectiveness in teaching English language speaking in higher school. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta, 2014, no. 3, pp. 105–109.
- Lupinogina Yu.A. Specifics of teaching listening comprehension to non-linguistic students. Simvol nauki, 2016, no. 1, pp. 176–179.
- Nikitina Yu.A., Suslova Yu.V. Genre approach to development of listening skills of military aviation high school students. Vektor nauki Tolyattinskiy gosudarstvennyy universiteta. Seriya: Pedagogika, psikhologiya, 2016, no. 1, pp. 41–45.
- Artamonova G.V. Professionalno-orientirovannaya samostoyatelnaya deyatelnost studentov [Professionally oriented independent learning activity of students]. Saarbrucken, LAP LAMBERT Publ., 2010. 149 p.
- Kornilova L.I. Modern pedagogical technologies in organization of independent work of cadets in learning a foreign language. Prepodavanie i izuchenie inostrannykh yazykov: traditsii i novatsii: sbornik dokladov Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. Togliatti, TVTI Publ., 2008, pp. 14–25.
- Lebedinskaya O.V. Self-organization of foreign language learning activities of military school students. Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo tsentra Rossiyskoy akademii nauk. Sotsialnye, gumanitarnye, mediko-biologicheskie nauki, 2012, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 616–620.
- Harmer J. How to teach English. Edinburgh, Longman Publ., 2001. 198 p.
- Chelyshkova M.B. Teoriya i praktika konstruirovaniya pedagogicheskikh testov [Theory and practice of designing of pedagogical tests]. Moscow, Logos Publ., 2002. 432 p.
- Mayorov A.N. Teoriya i praktika sozdaniya testov dlya sistemy obrazovaniya [Theory and practice of creating tests for the education system]. Moscow, Intellekt-Tsentr Publ., 2002. 352 p.
- Avanesov V.S. Metodologicheskie i teoreticheskie osnovy testovogo kontrolya. Dis. dokt. ped. nauk [Methodological and theoretical bases of pedagogical control test]. Sankt Petersburg, 1994. 339 p.
- Solnyshkina M., Solovova E., Harkova E., Kiselnikov A. Language assessment course: Structure, delivery and learning outcomes. International journal of environmental and science education, 2016, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 1223–1229.
- Avanesov V.S. Kompozitsiya testovykh zadaniy [The composition of the test tasks]. Moscow, Adept Publ., 1998. 217 p.
- Scrivener J. Learning teaching. Oxford, Macmillan Publ., 2005. 432 p.
- Common European framework of reference for languages: learning, teaching, assessment. Strasbourg: language policy unit. URL: coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/Source/Framework_EN.pdf.
- Kerr Philip, Jones Ceri. Straightforward. Students’ Book. Oxford, Macmillan Publ., 2013. 159 p.
- Kay Susan, Jones Vaughan. Inside Out. Students’ Book. Oxford, Macmillan Publ., 2009. 115 p.
- New Inside Out. Placement Tests. URL: insideout.net/new/resources/placement-tests.
- Oxford Online Placement Test. Features. URL: hoxfordenglishtesting.com/defaultmrarticle.aspx?id=3074.
- Education First. URL: ef.ru/test3/#/.
- TOEIC Examinee handbook – Speaking and Writing. URL: toeic.com.tw/sw/file/TOEIC_Speaking_and_Writing_Examinee_Handbook.pdf.
- Bubnova G.I. Competence approach: the methodological basis for compilation of test and measurement materials. Inostrannye yazyki v shkole, 2010, no. 10, pp. 64–69.; 2011, no. 1, pp. 62–66.