Technology for organizing mathematical problem solving using the concept of stage-by-stage development of mental actions and criteria-based assessment when training future mathematics teachers

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

Mathematical knowledge, due to the specific nature of its acquisition through problem solving, plays a special role in the development of various forms of thinking. When solving mathematical problems through the interiorisation of heuristic techniques, a cultural form of creative thinking is formed. The acquisition of analytical heuristics can be influenced by specific methods of organizing the learning process. This paper describes a tool for organizing the teaching of mathematical problem solving as a process aimed at developing guidelines – heuristics – according to the third type of orientation of P.Ya. Galperin’s theory of the stage-by-stage development of mental actions. The paper presents the results of a formative experiment on the acquisition of the proposed framework (the scheme for organizing mental activity, hereinafter referred to as the OMA) by future mathematics teachers while studying the integral calculus of one variable functions. Using the Mann–Whitney U-test, statistically significant differences in the levels of development of the Problem Setting Analysis heuristic were obtained in the control and experimental groups. Due to the small number of groups, a qualitative analysis of the experimental results was conducted. The feasibility of using the OMA framework to implement a strategy of complete acquisition and formative assessment is demonstrated. As it is hypothesized, the systematic use of the OMA framework in teaching to solve problems implements a third-type orientation teaching method and is appropriate for training maths teachers.

About the authors

Olga V. Makeeva

Ulyanovsk State Pedagogical University

Author for correspondence.
Email: mov_ulspu@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4345-2296

PhD (Physics and Mathematics), assistant professor of Chair of Higher Mathematics

Russian Federation, 432071, Ulyanovsk, Lenin Square, 4/5

References

  1. Makeeva O.V., Foliadova E.V. Instructional scheme of organizing mental activity of future maths teachers while mastering basic concepts of functional analysis. Volga Region pedagogical search, 2020, no. 4, pp. 108–115. doi: 10.33065/2307-1052-2020-4-34-108-115.
  2. Leontev A.N. Deyatelnost. Soznanie. Lichnost [Activity. Conscience. Personality]. Moscow, Smysl Publ., 2004. 352 p. EDN: QXIXLX.
  3. Medvedev A.M., Zhulanova I.V. Activity approach as a guideline of modern education: initial content and risks of reduction. World of Science. Pedagogy and Psychology, 2021, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 29–48. EDN: CZVJFB.
  4. Elkonin B.D. Modern era of the theory and practice of learning activity: key issues and perspectives. Psychological Science and Education, 2020, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 28–39. doi: 10.17759/pse.2020250403.
  5. Stepanova M.A. Variations on the subject of developmental education. Cultural-Historical Psychology, 2023, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 78–89. doi: 10.17759/chp.2023190408.
  6. Stepanova M.A. On the issue of teaching mathematics in elementary school: experiential learning experience. Lomonosov Pedagogical Educational Journal, 2024, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 161–189. EDN: GKAQQB.
  7. Galperin P.Ya. On Development of Mental Actions and Concepts. Cultural-Historical Psychology, 2010, no. 3, pp. 111–114. EDN: MUNIHJ.
  8. Liders A.G., Frolov Yu.I. Evolution of concepts of orientation and orienting activity in Galperin’s theory. Cultural-Historical Psychology, 2012, no. 4, pp. 13–27. EDN: PZSTJX.
  9. Podolskiy A.I. Scientific legacy of P.Ya. Galperin and the challenges of the 21st century. National Psychological journal, 2017, no. 3, pp. 9–20. doi: 10.11621/npj.2017.0303.
  10. Bloom B.S., ed. Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals: Handbook I, cognitive domain. New York, David McKey Co Publ., 1956. 230 p.
  11. Shapovalova O.N., Efremova N.F. The didactic potential of formative assessment of meta-disciplinary results of schoolchildren: Russian and foreign experience. World of Science. Pedagogy and Psychology, 2019, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 78–89. EDN: YAKEBM.
  12. Vysotskaya E.V., Rekhtman I.V. Two approaches to curriculum design following the third type of orientation: choosing ‘main units’ (with chemistry curriculum as an example). Cultural-Historical Psychology, 2012, no. 4, pp. 42–54. EDN: PZSTLB.
  13. Makeeva O.V., Foliadova E.V. Formative assessment of future teachers’ cognitive activity in the process of solving problems within math courses. Russian Digital Libraries Journal, 2019, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 644–654. doi: 10.26907/1562-5419-2019-22-6-644-654.
  14. Spiridonov V.F. Psikhologiya myshleniya. Reshenie zadach i problem [Psychology of thinking. Problem and task solving]. Moscow, Yurayt Publ., 2022. 323 p.
  15. Bezukladnikov K.E., Krasnoborova A.A., Kruze B.A. Kriterialnoe otsenivanie rezultatov obrazovaniya [Criteria-based assessment of educational outcomes]. Perm, PGGPU Publ., 2012. 126 p.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2025 Makeeva O.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies