DESIGNING THE TOOLKIT TO ASSESS THE RESEARCH ACTIVITY PRODUCTS OF PEDAGOGICAL MASTER’S DEGREE STUDENTS
- Authors: Neumoeva-Kolchedantseva E.V.1, Zakirova A.F.1
-
Affiliations:
- Tyumen State University, Tyumen
- Issue: No 1 (2022)
- Pages: 32-40
- Section: Pedagogical Sciences
- URL: https://vektornaukipedagogika.ru/jour/article/view/136
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18323/2221-5662-2022-1-32-40
- ID: 136
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The research activity is a systemic vector of professional education of a pedagogical master’s degree student that aims to train a teacher capable of scientifically substantiated solution complex and diverse professional tasks. The significance of the research activity in future teacher training determines, in many respects, the necessity for its organizational and methodological support, an integral part of which is the assessment of the process and the research activity results. The subject of this study is the performance aspect of the research activity products assessment considered in the context of the research project life cycle. The main task of the research is the development of assessment tools relevant to the research activity nature at different stages of the project life cycle. The solution of the assigned task is necessary to ensure constructive and productive feedback within the educational process, which provides the possibility of timely adjustment of the student’s research activity and, on the whole, flexible transitions between the stages of the research project life cycle. To solve this task, the authors describe the actual state and the prospects of studying the research activity as a support object; sum up the principles of the author’s concept of organizational and methodological support of the research activity; consider the stages of the research project life cycle; propose the pedagogical assessment interpretation; prove the requirements for pedagogical assessment; describe the procedure to design pedagogical assessment tools. The assessment cards for the products of analytical, design, formative, and presentational research activity are the study results. The proposed cards can form the base for more detailed development of assessment tools for evaluating products of the future teachers’ research activity.
About the authors
Elena Vitalyevna Neumoeva-Kolchedantseva
Tyumen State University, Tyumen
Author for correspondence.
Email: eneumoeva@yandex.ru
PhD (Psychology), Associate Professor
Russian FederationAlfiya Fagalovna Zakirova
Tyumen State University, Tyumen
Email: a.f.zakirova@utmn.ru
Doctor of Sciences (Pedagogy), Professor
Russian FederationReferences
- Zagvyazinskiy V.I. Nastupit li epokha Vozrozhdeniya? Strategiya innovatsionnogo razvitiya rossiyskogo obrazovaniya [Will there be a Renaissance? Strategy of innovative development of Russian education]. 2nd izd., pererab. i dop. Moscow, Logos Publ., 2015. 140 p.
- Podgotovka pedagoga-issledovatelya v universitetskom obrazovanii: kollektivnaya monografiya [Research Teacher Training in University Education: Collective Monograph]. Ed. V.I. Zagvyazinsky. Tyumen: Tyumen State University Publ., 2017. 164 p.
- Zakirova A.F., Neumoeva-Kolchedantseva E.V. Organizacionno-metodicheskoe soprovozhdenie razvitiya pedagoga kak sub"ekta issledovatel'skoj deyatel'nosti (monografiya) [Organizational and methodological support for the development of a teacher as a subject of research activity (monograph)]. Tyumen: Tyumen Regional State Institute for the Development of Regional Education, 2020. 90 p.
- Zinchenko Yu.P., ed. Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie v sovremennoy Rossii: strategicheskie orientiry razvitiya [Pedagogical education in modern Russia: strategic guidelines for development]. Rostov-on-Don, Yuzhnyy federalnyy universitet Publ., 2020. 736 p.
- Margolis A.A. Problems and prospects of the development of pedagogical education in the Russian Federation. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie, 2014, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 41–57.
- Zeer E.F., Popova O.S. Psychological guiding of students’ individual educational trajectories in vocational school. Obrazovanie i nauka, 2015, no. 4, pp. 88–99.
- Symanyuk E.E., Pecherkina A.A., Umnikova E.L. Development of professional competence of a teacher in innovative educational environment. Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie v Rossii, 2011, no. 1, pp. 20–23.
- Novichkova N.M., Dementeva N.N. Pedagogical support of future teachers professional self-determination. Mir nauki, kultury, obrazovaniya, 2019, no. 4, pp. 197–200.
- Nikolaeva M.V. Scientific and methodological support of innovative activities of the teacher in the educational organization. Izvestiya Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta, 2019, no. 5, pp. 9–13.
- Vedernikova L.V., Levykh A.Yu., Elantseva S.A., Povoroznyuk O.A. Preparation of teachers for research activity in the conditions of a modern general education school. Vysshee obrazovanie segodnya, 2019, no. 3, pp. 24–30. doi: 10.25586/RNU.HET.19.03.P.24.
- Vedernikova L.V., Elantseva S.A., Povoroznyuk O.A. Methodological approaches to practice-oriented university training of teachers. Chelovek i obrazovanie, 2019, no. 2, pp. 139–146.
- Efremova N.F. Evaluation quality as a guarantee of students’ competence-based training. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii, 2012, no. 11, pp. 119–125.
- Efremova N.F. Problems of Formation of Funds for Evaluation Funds of Universities. Vysshee obrazovanie segodnya, 2011, no. 3, pp. 17–21.
- Efremova N.F. Evidence centred design model in the design of measuring instruments. Pedagogicheskie izmereniya, 2018, no. 3, pp. 8–15.
- Shapovalova O.N., Efremova N.F. Formative assessment as a technique to develop schoolchildren’s educational autonomy. Pedagogika. Voprosy teorii i praktiki, 2020, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–8.
- Neumoeva-Kolchedantseva E.V. Assessing the process and results of pedagogical practice: master’s degree students. Pedagogicheskie izmereniya, 2020, no. 2, pp. 78–88.
- Zakirova A.F. The methodological unit of scientific research in terms of conceptualisation of pedagogical knowledge. Obrazovanie i nauka, 2015, no. 10, pp. 4–19.
- Cooper Robert G. Managing Technology Development Projects. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 2007, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 67–76.
- Kasprzhak A.G. The priority of educational outcomes as a tool for modernization of teacher training programs. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie, 2014, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 87–104.
- Subetto A.I. Ontologiya i epistemologiya kompetentnostnogo podkhoda, klassifikatsiya i kvalimetriya kompetentsiy [Ontology and epistemology of the competency-based approach, classification and qualimetry of competencies]. Sankt Petersburg, Issledovatelskiy tsentr problem kachestva podgotovki spetsialistov Publ., 2006. 72 p.