THE ROLE OF EGO AND NON-EGO BOUNDARIES IN THE DETERMINATION OF BEHAVIOR IN UNCERTAIN ENVIRONMENT
- Authors: Shapoval I.A.1
-
Affiliations:
- Orenburg State Pedagogical University, Orenburg
- Issue: No 3 (2017)
- Pages: 100-106
- Section: Psychological sciences
- URL: https://vektornaukipedagogika.ru/jour/article/view/216
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18323/2221-5662-2017-3-100-106
- ID: 216
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
This paper is the theoretical analysis of the issue of interrelations of ego and non-ego boundaries of a person and the determination of its behavior in the situation of subjective uncertainty. The goal of the research is the evaluation of the role of ego boundary in the determination of behavior of a person in the subjective uncertain environment. The analysis of behavior determination variants includes its self-determination, non-self-determination, and indetermination in the uncertainty of the future. It is shown, that the everyday behavior determination is a composition of self-determination and non-self-determination in their flexible individual proportions. The uncertainty situation as the bifurcation point determines the occurrence of a person borderline state when the habitual determination is out and the ego boundary system – dynamic (changing), open (in dialogical relations of a person with the world and oneself), functional (ego delimitation) – becomes tense. In this situation, the limitations are tested, ego and non-ego boundaries are recognized and reconstructed in a new environment. The author proves that the overcoming of actual boundaries and blocking of boundaries of new possibilities depend on the specificity of functioning of the boundaries that determines the causality locus as the orientation dominance within behavior and causal orientation as the dominant motivation (according to E. Deci and R. Ryan theory), the nature of behavior determination and the way of a person’s reaction to the uncertainty challenge. The result of the author’s analysis is the typology of behavior determination schemes with respect to the forms of experience of subjective uncertainty (positive, negative), ego delimitation variant (constructive, destructive, and deficient) and causal orientation (autonomic internal, controlled external, and impersonal amotivating). The author comes to the conclusion about the relations between the uncertainty experience and individual-typical compositions of behavior determination, which can change unexpectedly under the influence of uncertainty factor. Under these circumstances, the role of ego boundaries as a system is determined by their functions implementation that determines causal orientation, behavior determination nature, and the way of a person’s reaction to the uncertainty.
About the authors
Irina Anatolievna Shapoval
Orenburg State Pedagogical University, Orenburg
Author for correspondence.
Email: irinashapoval@yandex.ru
Doctor of Sciences (Pedagogics), Professor, professor of Chair of special psychology
Russian FederationReferences
- Bauman Z. Individualizirovannoe obshchestvo [Individualized society]. Moscow, Logos Publ., 2005. 390 p.
- Selezneva M.V. The comparative analysis of the terms “subject” and “agency” in the foreign psychology. Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Psikhologiya i pedagogika, 2015, no. 2, pp. 47–53.
- Harre R. Personal Being. Oxford, Blackwell Pub., 1983. 299 p.
- Dergacheva O.E. Autonomy and self-determination in the psychology of motivation: theory E. Deci and R. Ryan. Sovremennaya psikhologiya motivatsii. Moscow, Smysl Publ., 2002, pp. 103–121.
- Giller Yu.I. Sotsiologiya samostoyatelnoy lichnosti [Sociology of self-personality]. Moscow, Gaudemaus Publ., 2006. 224 p.
- Lukyanov O.V. Samoidentichnost kak uslovie ustoychivosti cheloveka v menyayushchemsya mire. Avtoref. dis. dokt. psikhol. nauk [Self-identity as a condition for the stability of man in a changing world]. Tomsk, 2009. 43 p.
- Prigozhin I., Stengers I. Poryadok iz khaosa: novyy dialog cheloveka s prirodoy [Order out of chaos: man’s New dialogue with nature]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1986. 432 p.
- Sardzhveladze N.I. Lichnost i ee vzaimodeystvie s sotsialnoy sredoy [Personality and its interaction with the social environment]. Tbilisi, Metsniereba Publ., 1989. 204 p.
- Bradshaw J. On The Family. A New Way of Creating Soild Self-Esteem. United States, 1996. 305 p.
- Brown N.W. Coping with infuriating, mean, critical people: the destructive narcissistic pattern. Westport, CT Praeger Publ., 2006. 191 p.
- Polster I., Polster M. Integrirovannaya geshtalt-terapiya: kon-tury teorii i praktiki [Integrated Gestalt therapy: Contours of theory and practice]. Moscow, Klass Publ., 1996. 272 p.
- Kulikova T.V. Filosofiya granitsy: fenomenologicheskiy i episte-mologicheskiy podkhody. Dis. dokt. filos. nauk [The philosophy of boundaries: a phenomenological and epistemological approaches]. Nizhniy Novgorod, 2011. 334 p.
- Leontev D.A. The challenge of uncertainty as the Central problem of psychology of personality. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya, 2015, vol. 8, no. 40, pp. 2–9.
- Petrovskiy V.A. Chelovek nad situatsiey [The person on the situation]. Moscow, Smysl Publ., 2010. 559 p.
- Sokolova E.T. Klinicheskaya psikhologiya utraty Ya [Clinical psychology of loss I]. Moscow, Smysl Publ., 2015. 895 p.
- MillonТ. Disorders of Personality: DSM-IV and Beyond. NY, John Wiley & Sons Publ, 1996. 548 p.
- Shapoval I.A. Functions and dysfunctions of borders I: the effects of self-organization and semideterministic system. Klinicheskaya i spetsialnaya psikhologiya, 2016, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 19–32.
- Deci E.L., Ryan R.M. Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2000, vol. 25, pp. 54–67.
- Ammon G. Handbuch der Dynamischen Psychiatric. München, Er. Reinhardt Verlag Publ., 1982. 967 p.
- Kuzmina E.I. Psikhologiya svobody: teoriya i praktika [The psychology of freedom: theory and practice]. Sankt Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2007. 336 p.
- Nartova-Bochaver S.K., Silina O.V. The dynamics of the development of psychological boundaries during childhood. Aktualnye problemy psikhologicheskogo znaniya, 2014, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 13–28.
- Shamshikova E.O. Determination of narcissism in the organization of psychological space of the personality. Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta, 2013, no. 3, pp. 24–35.