MATHEMATICAL BASIS FOR TRANSITION OF AN ORGANIZATION TO A HIGHER LEVEL OF DEVELOPMENT


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Knowledge transfer of the personnel within the team is one of the conditions of effective activity of the executives of innovative projects. It is caused by the increased requirements of the government policy implemented in the country, which is aimed at the knowledge intellectualization. In this respect, the organizational management of the processes by means of which technologies, expertise, skills, and solutions of high-tech tasks are passed from one executive to another, supposes development of the organizational system mechanism resulting in the gradual transformation of the organization into a self-learning system.

Why is it so important at the present stage of socio-economic development of our country? That is because a self-learning organization is characterized by constant updating of its own knowledge and quick adaptation to the external environment for implementation of innovative ideas.

The purpose of this paper is to provide a mathematical basis for activities that the staff of an organization requires so that it could be classified as a "self-learning" organization.

Currently, there are four types of classification of a self-learning organization. The author suggests the fifth type which contains certain classification features that characterize the transfer of knowledge within the team of executives. These coefficients are integral indices, each of which, in its turn, consists of a set of particular items estimated with quantitative values of indicators.

In order to optimize the current state of knowledge of the team of executive, the paper suggests using the apparatus of Boolean algebra to build the transition from one quality of knowledge to another. The choice of mathematical apparatus is explained by its use in modern complex dynamic systems to assess the status of these systems in dynamics.

About the authors

Svetlana Dmitrievna Syrotiuk

Togliatti State University, Togliatti

Author for correspondence.
Email: sirotyk_sd@mail.ru

PhD (Pedagogy), Associate Professor, assistant professor of Chair “Management of Organization”, doctoral candidate

Russian Federation

References

  1. Garvin D.A. Building a learning organization. Harvard Business Review, 1993, no. 7, pp. 71–83.
  2. Senge P. Pyataya distsiplina. Iskusstvo i praktika samoobuchayushcheysya organizatsii [The fifth discipline. The art and practice of the learning organization]. Moscow, Olimp Biznes Publ., 1999. 406 p.
  3. Milner B.Z. Upravlenie znaniyami. Evolyutsiya i revolyutsiya v organizatsii [Knowledge management. Evolution and revolution in organization]. Moscow, INFRA-M Publ., 2003. 178 p.
  4. Gulyanskaya E.A. Application of learning organizations theory in modern Russia. Sovremennye sotsialno-filosofskie i psikhologo-pedagogicheskie problemy : sbornik nauchnykh trudov. Stavropol, SevKavGTU Publ., 2005, vol. XVIII, pp. 56–58.
  5. Glukhova L.V. Priorities identification of government support of national innovation system management and development. Vestnik Povolzhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta servisa. Seriya: Ekonomika, 2009, no. 9, pp. 14–22.
  6. Semushkina S.R. Learning organization in theory and practice. URL: flm.su/_elements/magazine/view_full.php?id=52&popup=;:no&PHPSESSI D=17045d22d.
  7. Vil-Vilyams E.I. Learning organization – experience of development within two years. URL: kadrovik.ru/old/04-2002/stat2.htm.
  8. Dudyashova V.P., Nesterova N.A. Knowledge as the economic resource of an enterprise and an object of management. Metodologiya ekonomicheskoy nauki: problemy i perspektivy razvitiya : sbornik nauchnykh trudov po itogam Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii. Kostroma, KGTU Publ., 2006, pp. 214–126.
  9. Syrotyuk S.D. Learning organization as advanced form of competence of personnel. Vektor nauki Tolyattinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika i upravlenie, 2012, no. 2, pp. 72–77.
  10. Pedler M., ed. Praktika obucheniya deystviem [Practice of learning by doing]. Moscow, Gardariki Publ., 2000. 336 p.
  11. Ignateva G.A. Proektirovanie deyatelnostnogo soderzhaniya professionalnogo razvitiya pedagoga v sisteme postdiplomnogo obrazovaniya. Diss. dokt. ped. nauk [Designing of activity content of professional development of a teacher within the higher degree education system]. Nizhniy Novgorod, 2006. 414 p.
  12. Gerasimov E.I. Praktiko-orientirovannyy podkhod k povysheniyu kvalifikatsii personala v usloviyakh «samoobuchayushcheysya organizatsii». Diss. kand. ped. nauk [Practice-oriented approach to personnel development within the conditions of “learning organization”]. Moscow, 2008. 180 p.
  13. Glukhova L.V., Gudkova S.A., Syrotyuk S.D. Metodologiya upravleniya transformatsiey organizatsii v samoobuchayushchuyusya sistemu [Methodology of management transformation of the organization in self learning system]. Voronezh, VGPU Publ., 2012. 148 p.
  14. Glukhova L.V., Syrotyuk S.D. Analysis of modern approach to building a self-learning organization based on in-house training. Vestnik Samarskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta. Seriya: Psikhologo-pedagogicheskie nauki, 2014, no. 4, pp. 79–88.
  15. Glukhova L.V. Upravlenie innovatsionnoy deyatelnostyu predpriyatiy v sovremennykh ekonomicheskikh usloviyakh. Avtoref. diss. dokt. ekon. nauk [Enterprise innovative activity management in modern economic conditions]. Moscow, 2010. 54 p.
  16. Glukhova L.V. Ekonomika znaniy: modeli, metody, upravlenie [Knowledge economy: models, methods, management]. Moscow, Institut kommertsii i prava Publ., 2008. 118 p.
  17. Syrotyuk S.D. Designing of the information-educational system core of a learning. Vektor nauki Tolyattinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2014, no. 3, pp. 327–330.
  18. Glukhova L.V. Reasoning of mathematical model for organizational structure of informational system for training specialists. Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo tsentra RAN. Tekhnologiya upravleniya organizatsiey. Kachestvo produktsii i uslug, 2007, no. 3, pp. 34–44.
  19. Syrotyuk S.D. Background formation learning organization in today socio-economic development. Baltiyskiy gumanitarnyy zhurnal, 2015, no. 4, pp. 109–112.
  20. Syrotyuk S.D., Odarich I.N. Application of the principle of updating competence of the staff in the learning organization. Azimut nauchnykh issledovaniy: ekonomika i upravlenie, 2015, no. 4, pp. 63–66.
  21. Yarygin O.N., Korostelev A.A., Pudovkina N.G. Analiticheskaya kompetentnost i urovni realizatsii analiticheskoy funktsii upravleniya [Analytical competence and the levels of implementation of management analytical function]. Togliatti, TltSU Publ., 2011. 230 p.
  22. Yarygin O.N. «Competence» and «competency» as emergent property human activity. Vektor nauki Tolyattinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2011, no. 1, pp. 345–348.
  23. Yarygin O.N., Korostelev A.A. Systemic dynamics as the basis of modern managerial competence. Aktualnye problemy ekonomiki i prava, 2014, no. 4, pp. 196–205.
  24. Yarygin O.N., Belyaev M.A., Temirdzhanova M.A. Management decisions in multicriterion tasks based on a probability matrix of paired comparisons. Karelskiy nauchnyy zhurnal, 2014, no. 4, pp. 98–100.
  25. Yarygin O.N., Kondurar M.V. Diagnosis of competence levels. Azimut nauchnykh issledovaniy: pedagogika i psikhologiya, 2014, no. 1, pp. 90–93.
  26. Steinbach B., Posthoff Ch. Boolean differential calculus – theory and applications. Journal of computational and theoretical nanoscience, american scientific publishers, 2010, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 933–981.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c)



This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies