INCLUSIVE EDUCATION MODEL ON THE EXAMPLE OF RUSSIAN AND FOREIGN HIGH SCHOOLS


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The importance of the issue chosen for the study is explained by the urge to search for new conceptual solutions and strategies which promote harmonization of human relations in general and the professional adaptation of people with special educational needs. Educational institutions of higher education are currently solving the problem of choosing the most effective model and technology for implementing the inclusive paradigm.

The author analyzes inclusive education models employed both in Russian and foreign universities which implement inclusive education. The author states that inclusive education models in Russian universities are block-structured and aimed at increasing the sensitivity of the institution towards persons with health limitations through solving problems in teaching and upbringing. In foreign universities, inclusive educational models are varied and institutional in structure, mostly legally oriented, and working with a wider category of people with special educational needs than in Russia. In the opinion of the author, the search for a unified concept of inclusive vocational education, along with the increase in the demands of students with special educational needs, requires higher education institutions to develop their own strategies, to solve the problem of choosing the most effective model and technology for implementing the inclusive paradigm.

As a result of the study, it was found that a system of normative and legislative acts and mechanisms which include a clear concept and strategy for implementing inclusive education, training, and continuity of interaction should become the necessary basis for the implementation of inclusive education.

About the authors

Olga Yurievna Muller

Surgut State University, Surgut

Author for correspondence.
Email: olga_megion@mail.ru

postgraduate student

Russian Federation

References

  1. Malofeev N.N. Western European experience in supporting students with special educational needs in an integrated learning environment. Defektologiya, 2005, no. 5, pp. 3–18.
  2. Nazarova N.M. Theoretical and methodological foundations of educational integration. Inklyuzivnoe obrazovanie: metodologiya, praktika, tekhnologiya: materialy mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. Moscow, MGPPU Publ., 2011, pp. 7–9.
  3. Mitchell D. Effektivnye pedagogicheskie tekhnologii spetsialnogo i inklyuzivnogo obrazovaniya [Effective pedagogical technologies of special inclusive education]. Moscow, Perspektiva Publ., 2011. 138 p.
  4. Groznaya N.S. Inclusive education abroad: from dream to reality. A review of the contents of a specialized issue of “International Journal of Inclusive Education” (2011. Vol. 15, № 1). Informatsionno-metodicheskiy portal po inklyuzivnomu i spetsialnomu obrazovaniyu Departamenta obrazovaniya g. Moskvy. URL: edu-open.ru/Portals/0/ Documents/ international/ SD_XXI_ 2010_ n5_Groznaya.pdf.
  5. Liventseva N.A. Review of current foreign research in inclusive education. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie, 2011, no. 3, pp. 114–121.
  6. Wolfensberger W. The principle of normalization in human services. Toronto, National Institute on Mental Retardation Publ., 1972. 258 p.
  7. Declaration on the Rights of Mentally Retarded Persons: adopted by General Assembly resolution No. 2856 of December 20, 1971. Organizatsiya obedinennykh natsiy. URL: un.org/ru/documents/decl_conv/ declarations/retarded.html.
  8. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Organizatsiya obedinennykh natsiy. URL: un.org/ru/ documents/decl_conv/ declarations/declhr.
  9. Declaration on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: adopted by the resolution of the General Assembly of 9 December 1975 No. 3447. Organizatsiya obedinennykh natsiy. URL: un.org/ru/documents/decl_conv/declarations/disabled.html.
  10. Standard Rules for the Equalization of Opportunities for Persons with Disabilities: adopted by UN General Assembly Resolution No. 48/96 of December 20, 1993. Organizatsiya obedinennykh natsiy. URL: un.org/ru/documents/decl_conv/conventions/disabled.html.
  11. Convention on the Rights of the Child. Organizatsiya obedinennykh natsiy. URL: un.org/ru /documents/decl_conv/conventions /childcon.shtml.
  12. World Conference on Education for Persons with Special Need: Accessibility and Quality, Salamanca, Spain. 7-10 June, 1994. Organizatsiya obedinennykh natsiy. URL: un.org/ru/ documents/decl_conv/ declarations/pdf/ salamanka. pdf.
  13. The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: adopted by the UN General Assembly Resolution on December 13, 2006, No. 61/106. Organizatsiya obedinennykh natsiy. URL: un.org/ru/documents/decl_conv/conventions/disability.
  14. Armstrong A., Armstrong D., Spandagou E. Inclusion: by choice or by chance. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 2011, vol. 15, pp. 29–39.
  15. Oleshova V.V. Formation of early-support system in the US. Sovremennye problemy teorii, istorii, metodologii inklyuzivnogo obrazovaniya: sbornik nauchnykh statey po materialam VII Mezhdunarodnogo teoretiko-metodologicheskogo seminara. Moscow, MGPU Publ., 2015, pp. 87–92.
  16. Boginskaya Yu.V. Sotsialno-pedagogicheskaya podderzhka studentov s ogranichennymi vozmozhnostyami v vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniyakh: teoriya i praktika [Socio-pedagogical support of students with disabilities in higher educational institutions: theory and practice]. Yalta, KGU Publ., 2012. 384 p.
  17. Nikitina M.I. The correlation between differentiated and integrated learning. The problem of training specialists in correctional pedagogy. Integrirovannoe obuchenie: problemy i perspektivy: materialy mezhdunarodnogo seminara. Sankt Petersburg, Obrazovanie Publ., 1996, pp. 110–115.
  18. Yarskaya-Smirnova E.R., Romanov P.V. Higher education accessibility for disabled persons. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2005, no. 10, pp. 48–56.
  19. Alekhina S.V., Semago M.M., eds. Sozdanie i aprobatsiya modeli psikhologo-pedagogicheskogo soprovozhdeniya inklyuzivnoy praktiki [Create and test a model of psychological and pedagogical support of inclusive practices]. Moscow, MGPPU Publ., 2012. 156 p.
  20. Kantor V.Z., Volkova I.P., Bogdanova A.A. Inclusive education of disabled children. Zdorovesberegayushchee obrazovanie, 2014, no. 4, pp. 20–23.
  21. Kalashnikova S.A. On the design of an adapted educational program for primary general education for disabled students. Molodoy uchenyy, 2014, no. 8, pp. 786–790.
  22. Khrapylina L.P. Reabilitatsiya invalidov [Rehabilitation of Disabled People]. Moscow, Ekzamen Publ., 2006. 415 p.
  23. Nazarova N.M. To the problem of development of theoretical and methodological outlines of integrated education. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie, 2011, no. 3, pp. 5–11.
  24. Aleshina M.V., Pleve I.R. Social lift or social exclusion? Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii, 2009, no. 11, pp. 126–131.
  25. Loshakova I.I. Preodolenie sotsialnogo neravenstva v sisteme dovuzovskogo obrazovaniya [Overcoming social inequality in the system of pre-university education]. Saratov, SGTU Publ., 2003. 267 p.
  26. Shemanov A.Yu., Popova N.T. Inclusion in culturological perspective. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie, 2011, no. 1, pp. 74–82.
  27. Volskaya O.V., Flotskaya N.Yu., Bulanova S.Yu., Usova Z.M. Inclusive education implementation model in present day world. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya, 2014, no. 6, pp. 965–972.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c)



This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies