MONITORING AND EVALUATION PRACTICE IN THE CONTEXT OF REFORMING OF THE RUSSIAN VOCATIONAL EDUCATION: PROBLEMS AND PROSPECTS
- Authors: Artamonova E.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Kazan State Power Engineering University, Kazan
- Issue: No 2 (2017)
- Pages: 9-13
- Section: Pedagogical Sciences
- URL: https://vektornaukipedagogika.ru/jour/article/view/217
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18323/2221-5662-2017-2-9-13
- ID: 217
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The paper analyzes modern trends related to reforming of education systems in different countries, including Russia, focusing on monitoring and evaluation processes. The author describes functional models of vocational education and conditions that affect the structure and contents of the monitoring and evaluation activities. The concept of “evaluation” in education is introduced and considered as an integrative category of evaluation-analytical activity in the context of improving the quality of education. This paper analyzes the use of the concept both in foreign educational systems and in Russia, defines its role in the process of creation and development of the Russian system of the education quality assessment which is considered to be a combination of organizational and functional structures, norms and rules that provide the assessment of student performance. While forming the Russian system of education quality assessment, the improvement of the quality of monitoring and evaluation of educational results is very important and is implemented in Russian modern education through a number of activities. In this regard, particular attention is paid to the introduction of mandatory state final certification for a certain category of citizens in the form of a unified state examination (USE). The author considers this exam as the Russian interpretation of foreign experience in the part of the final assessment of educational results in connection “school – university” and shows the positive and negative features of this process in the Russian educational practice.
The problems indicated in the paper suggest the necessity for further study of the reforming the monitoring and evaluation activities in the national education system in relation to the methodology and tools of this process.
About the authors
Ekaterina Valerievna Artamonova
Kazan State Power Engineering University, Kazan
Author for correspondence.
Email: artamonova_ek@mail.ru
PhD (Pedagogy), Associate Professor, assistant professor of Chair “Foreign languages”
Russian FederationReferences
- RF. The concept of the Federal target program of education development for 2016–2020 years, decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of 29 December 2014 №. 2765-R. (In Russ.)
- Priority directions of development of the educational system of the Russian Federation (approved by the government of the Russian Federation). Bukhgalterskiy uchet v byudzhetnykh i nekommercheskikh organizatsiyakh, 2006, no. 24, pp. 15–23.
- RF. The strategy of innovative development of the Russian Federation for the period until 2020, decree of the Government of the Russian Federation from December 8, 2011 № 2227-R. (In Russ.)
- Bolotov V.A., Efremova N.F. Sistema otsenki kachestva obrazovaniya [The system of education quality assessment]. Moscow, Logos Publ., 2007. 192 p.
- Artamonova E.V. The monitoring of students’ knowledge in the Russian professional education: present, past, future. Vektor nauki Tolyattinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2012, no. 3, pp. 224–226.
- The PISA 2003 assessment framework: mathematics, reading, science and problem solving knowledge and skills. Paris, OECD Publ., 2003. 426 p.
- Bateson D., Nicol C., Achroeder T. Alternative assessrnent and tables of specification for the third international mathematics and science study. ICC, 1991, no. 64, pp. 230–238.
- Dochy F., Segers M., Buehl M. The relation between assessment practices and outcomes of studies: The case of research on prior knowledge. Review of Educational Research, 1999, no. 69, pp. 145–186.
- Stecher B. Performance assessment in an era of standards-based educational accountability. Stanford, Stanford University Publ., 2010. 49 p.
- Parshall C., Spray J., Davey T. Springer. Practical consideratios in computer based testing. New York, SAGE Publ., 2002. 222 p.
- Zvonnikov V.I., Chelyshkova M.B. Sovremennye sredstva otsenivaniya rezultatov obucheniya [Modern means of estimation of results of training]. Moscow, Akademiya Publ., 2007. 224 p.
- Efremova N.F., Zvonnikov V.I., Chelyshkova M.B. Pedagogical measurements in the educational system. Pedagogika, 2006, no. 2, pp. 14–22.
- Leybovich A.N., ed. Kontseptsiya obshcherossiyskoy sistemy otsenki kachestva obrazovaniya [The concept of the national system of education quality assessment]. Moscow, Federalnaya sluzhba po nadzoru v sfere obrazovaniya i nauki Publ., 2006. 90 p.
- Bolotov V.A. Unified state examination: on the way to creating a system of independent quality assessment of education. Vysshee obrazovanie segodnya, 2004, no. 11, pp. 12–15.
- Kovaleva G.S. Osnovnye podkhody k sravnitelnoy otsenke kachestva matematicheskogo i estestvennonauchnogo obrazovaniya v stranakh mira (po materialam mezhdunarodnogo issledovaniya TIMSS) [The main approaches to comparative assessment of the quality of mathematics and science education in countries of the world (materials of the international study TIMSS)]. Moscow, Tsentr OKO IOSO RAO Publ., 1996. 92 p.
- Konkurentosposobna li nasha shkola? Mezhdunarodnye issledovaniya kak indikator kachestva shkolnogo obrazovaniya [Competitive our school? International studies as an indicator of quality of school education]. Moscow, NIU VShE Publ., 2004. 58 p.
- Kovaleva G.S., ed. Novyy vzglyad na gramotnost: po materialam mezhdunarodnogo issledovaniya PISA-2000 [A new look at literacy: an international study PISA–2000]. Moscow, Logos Publ., 2004. 196 p.
- Artamonova E.V., Galiakhmetova A.T., Andreeva E.A. Reforming the quality control of educational outcomes: the Russian experience. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta, 2014, no. 6, pp. 149–153.
- Bolotov: the evaluation should show the student his strengths and weaknesses. RIA novosti. URL: ria.ru/sn_edu/20160922/1477574896.html.
- Ibragimov G.I. Methodological foundations and factors of didactic concepts development. Pedagogika, 2011, no. 10, pp. 12–19.
- Sistema otsenki kachestva obrazovaniya [The system of education quality assessment]. Lesnoy, Upravlenie obrazovaniya Publ., 2008. 35 p.